As I'm sure you've heard, the Earth's surface temperature is increasing because of anthropogenic (human-caused) pollution. That's the topic of a research essay that I wrote, so I know a lot about this phenomena. The essay covered four out of five subjects: Science, in the aspect of how the Earth is warming, Social Studies, represented in how people are affected and/or causing global warming, Literature, in researching and comprehending information, and Language Arts, in writing the actual essay. The only subject left out is Math, and my assignment is to relate global warming to mathematics. Well, scientists use math to predict the rates at which some factors may escalate. If math weren't involved, scientists wouldn't be able to predict how warm it may get, when it can get that warm, and the extinction rates of animals and plants. Math is also needed to find the rates at which the temperature has already changed, and the speed that it is increasing at. If you think about it, this is most of the information that we need to understand global warming. So if we didn't have math, global warming would pretty much be a mystery. Thank you, mathematics, for helping us understand why the Earth is warming, and why it's such a big deal!
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Haitian Earthquake-- Why So Significant?
The story of the massive earthquake in Haiti on January 12, 2010 has been all over the news. But what makes this earthquake more significant than other earthquakes that have occured recently? Well, there are three good reasons:
- The earthquake occured extremely close to Haiti's capital city, Port au Prince.
- It occured only 10 or 15 meters below the Earth's crust, which is very shallow, and makes the earthquake notably powerful.
- Haiti is a poor counrty, and many people can't afford to build a strong building. As a result, many buildings were destroyed.
These factors coming into play made this earthquake a "worst case scenario," as Jian Lin, a senior scientist with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) said. The Haitian earthquake was caused by "a highly complex tangle of tectonic faults" underneath where the North American tectonic plate meets the Carribean tectonic plate. The strike-slip fault didn't cause a tsunami or any other type of dangerous or disconcerting wave because it was underneath land, as opposed to sea. Aftershocks are expected from any amount of time from days to decades. Unfortunately, about 50,000 people were killed. All of the other Carribean nations are advised to take note and stay alert- this could be their fate as well.
While I extend my deepest sympathy to Haitians affected by this massive tremor, I am glad that it didn't claim more than the 50,000 lives that have already been lost because of it. I can't imagine something this devastating taking place in my hometown, and I'd prefer not to. The terrible fact that this devastation took place anywhere in the world is upsetting. I anticipate and hope that Haiti will be able to rebuild, just as New Orleans, Louisiana did after Hurricane Katrina wiped out homes and buildings in August 2005.
Source: ScienceDaily
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100114143321.htm
Monday, November 23, 2009
Class Response- Cork Popping Experiment
*Note: This picture shows the reaction between baking soda and vinegar in an uncorked test tube. In our experiment, the test tube was corked.
As you can imagine, class was quite interesting when our teacher announced that our experiment was to shoot a cork across the classroom. The method was actually quite simple- we had to find the correct ratio of baking soda to vinegar to make the cork hit the window on the other side of the classroom, which was 675 cm away. The combination of baking soda and vinegar causes a chemical reaction, creating carbon dioxide, or CO2. The CO2 then expands, creating pressure behind the cork. This is what causes the cork to pop out of the test tube.
- In our first attempt, we used 10 mL of baking soda, and 15 mL of vinegar. We first added the baking soda to the test tube. Once we were on the firing range, we added the vinegar. The cork went 605 cm out of the total 675 cm.
- My lab partners and I decided to increase the quantities of both the baking soda and vinegar for our second attempt. When we were on the firing range, the test tube was pointed too low. As a result, the vinegar spilled directly onto the floor, only a little bit getting into the test tube. The cork only popped 40 cm.
- Since we made a silly mistake on our second attempt, we decided to try the same thing again. This time, our cork popped 655 cm out of the total 675 cm.
- We decided to increase the amount of baking soda to 20 mL, and decrease the amount of vinegar to 10 mL. This time, the cork popped 589 cm, 156 cm less than the time before.
- This time, we decided to add the vinegar first, as in our tries 1-4 we had added baking soda first. When the baking soda was added, there was not much initial reaction. Because of this, my lab partner, who was holding the test tube, shook it. Unfortunately, he shook it vertically. The cork shot up, hit the ceiling, and fell behind us.
- We decided to try the same method as Trial 5. The cork went 401 cm before falling down. My lab partners and I agreed that adding baking soda first doesn't work as well.
- For our 7th try, we decided to use equal amounts of baking soda and vinegar, using 15 mL of both. We also went back to adding the baking soda before the vinegar. This proved to be our best method so far- it went the full 675 cm, hitting the vent at the back of the class. However, we did not hit the window.
- We decided to use the same method again, but aim more toward the window. The cork went 675 cm again, hitting the windowsill, but again, not the window.
- Our group decided to increase both the quantities of baking soda and vinegar to 20 mL. This time, the cork hit the last tile, so again, it went 675 cm.
- Once again, we tried the same thing, and got the same result. We kept getting so close to hitting the window, but that's all we got- close.
- For our 11th attempt, we used 10 mL of baking soda, and 20 mL of vinegar. This time, the cork popped out, hit the light, and fell, at 510 cm.
- We used the same method as above, and got the result that we had been getting-the cork went 675 cm, and hit the vent at the back of the class.
- Our 13th try was our last. We decided to try the same thing as our 12th try, hoping that our problem was with our angle. We tried it again, and got the same result.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed this experiment. Though our group's cork never hit the window, we had fun trying to figure out how to get the result we want. I think that out of all the experiments we've done so far, this was my favorite.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Meteor Shower- October 2009
Friday, September 18, 2009
Blue Eyes
I found this article interesting, being blue-eyed myself. I also found it interesting because I have ancestors from Denmark, one of the countires this study was conducted in. My question is, how did this mutation take place?
One Common Ancestor Behind Blue Eyes LiveScience
http://www.livescience.com/health/080131-blue-eyes.html
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Plasticity Lab
As I stated before, this lab was to demonstrate the plasticity of Earth's mantle. The mixture that we created was similar to the mantle because it reacts the same way that scientists have found that the mantle does. It has the same texture as well. Both substances are solid, yet behave like a liquid, and also behave somewhat like plastic.
I enjoyed this lab a lot. I want to try this again at home, because the mixture that we created was so interesting and fun to play with!
Source:
Wikipedia.org
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
October Sky Blog
"October Sky" can be connected to science, math and character education because Homer used science to both build his rocket, and make it fly. The Russian sattelite Sputnik is also relevent in the same ways as rockets. In addition, the health hazards that the miners faced are also valid connections, because the human body and health are also part of science.
Math was used in figuring out how to get it off the ground, how fast it would go, how high it would go, and where it would eventually land. Adding to this, Homer proved that the boys's rocket did not start the forest fire by figuring out how high it would go, and how far it had traveled. Homer had calculated the exact spot that the rocket would have landed- and found it right there.
The character traits Homer and the "Rocket Boys", as they were called, displayed can be connected to CARES. For example, the boys worked together to build the rocket, showing cooperation. Homer used assertion when talking to his father about continuing to try to build his rockets, though showing respect for his wishes. This would show both assertion and respect. Empathy was shown when Homer's father told the son of a man who was killed in the mines what a great man his father was, and how terrible it was that the accident that had killed him occurred. Throughout the movie, Homer showed self-control by not physically hurting his father, no matter how rude and uncaring Mr. Hickam was to his son.
I enjoyed the movie "October Sky" very much, and I think that all the science and math connections, as well as connections to character education, are very relevent to our curriculum.